Special Feature
U.S.-China Decoupling: Beyond Trade
U.S.-China Decoupling: Beyond Trade<br/>中美脫鉤:貿易以外

U.S.-China Decoupling: Beyond Trade<br/>中美脫鉤:貿易以外

The economic fallout from the Covid-19 pandemic disguises the impact of the U.S.-China decoupling and economic confrontation in economic data, making analysis difficult. What to some appeared as a trade dispute has now more evidently morphed into a broader rivalry. 

The economic dimension of this rivalry encompasses more than just tariffs on trade and is rapidly expanding to entail a deep decoupling of the two economies.

To answer the question: “How far could the decoupling go?” it is imperative to understand what the two sides are setting out to achieve.

China’s aim, from an economic perspective, is as far as possible to maintain the ex-ante status quo, which has served its economic interests so well.

From the American perspective, the initial aim of the tariffs was to bring China to the negotiating table with a view to making the economic relationship more sustainable: creating deep but symmetric economic engagement, with reciprocity being the guiding principle.

An equitable economic relationship on market economy lines, however, will always be incompatible with the Communist Party of China’s control over the direction of the Chinese economy. Therefore, anything other than a fudge would be unacceptable to either side, and the phase one trade deal, signed in January, was that fudge.


Impact of Covid-19 

The Covid-19 pandemic precipitated the shift in U.S.-China relations. Moreover, the pandemic and a range of further issues including the emergence of so-called wolf warrior diplomacy and the imposition of the National Security Law in Hong Kong have served to shift the nature of U.S. engagement with China. The idea that Chinese expansionism requires, perhaps, a more assertive form of economic statecraft has acquired greater currency in Washington. 

The policy aim, therefore, seems to have morphed from being one of trying to bring pressure to bear on China to renegotiate a deep but fair economic relationship, to one aimed at bringing about a strategic decoupling, with a view to containing China’s expansionism.


Effect on trade

Bilateral trade has fallen from a peak in September 2018 of US$668 billion, on a 12-month rolling basis, to just US$519 billion now, a fall on 22%.

The bilateral deficit has fallen 27% from peak to now. Chinese outbound foreign direct investment (FDI) to the U.S. is now negligible.

FDI from the United States into China remains in its established range of US$12 billion to US$15 billion, which is small in relation to the overall capital stock of either country and other flows between them.


Scope beyond trade

Beyond trade and investment, the scope of the decoupling is expanding. Moves to raise and enforce compliance with listing standards on U.S. capital markets could well result in Chinese-based companies delisting from U.S. exchanges.

Conversely, China’s attempts to attract foreign participation in its capital markets are meeting with increased resistance from U.S. policymakers, as they fear such inflows could provide China with economic leverage and the hard currency inflows that could help facilitate geopolitical expansionism.

The logical conclusion of attempting to suppress Chinese expansionism through economic statecraft is surely a far greater decoupling and bifurcation of the global economy than that implied by current policy.

The development of the digital RMB and greater efforts to internationalize its use should be seen as a preemptive move by China to help immunize its economy from further escalation, anticipating U.S. moves to limit or prohibit Chinese access to the U.S. dollar payment system. 

For the U.S. to achieve its goals, given the U.S. itself accounts for only about one quarter of global GDP, it will become increasingly important to build alliances and the support of allies to render its geo-economic policies effective.


This article is an extract from an essay about the scope of the ongoing U.S.-China economic decoupling beyond trade. You can read the full article on the Hinrich Foundation website: www.hinrichfoundation.com


Stewart Paterson, Research Fellow, Hinrich Foundation