BUSINESS
September 2003
Issue

Unleashing Organisational Intelligence
Creativity and innovation are fuelled by the intelligence of
people who have the freedom and right to express their ideas, writes FRANK
J ADICK
How can we liberate the creativity and intelligence of every employee? How
can we integrate their individual ideas, inspiration, and analysis into rapid decisions
and actions and co-ordinate them to create value for customers? How can we build
organisational intelligence?
No centrally conceived design can produce both the freedom needed to
empower individual intelligence and the rapidly changing network of interconnections
needed to bring free thinkers together in co-ordinated action with an intense focus. We
cannot design intelligent organisations -- we must grow them through the convergence of
market and community processes. To grow intelligent organisations, we must establish seven
conditions, based on freedom of choice and democratic participation.
1. Widespread truth, measurement, and rights
People can't make responsible choices if they don't know what's going on.
Bureaucrats tend to hoard information as a source of personal power. The intelligent
organisation creates a rich bath of "lavish communication." This requires: full
financial information, training all employees how to read financial statements; regularly
posted measurements for all activities; open discussion of strategic options and
competitive situations; talk of how each part fits with the whole; freedom of speech,
press, and e-mail; and the right of inquiry, learning to pursue the mission and best serve
customers.
2.
Liberated teams
Behind nearly every recent innovation, from quality to re-engineering, is
the superior effectiveness of teams. Teams are the basic building block, the
"cell" of the intelligent organisation. To reap the benefits of autonomous,
empowered teams, we will need: team choice of task, partners, members, and connections;
whole-team measurement and reward; training in self-management processes and
whole-business judgement; co-ordination by the team, not from the level above; and
integration of the team purposes with a larger worthwhile purpose.
3. Freedom to be enterprising
Intelligent organisations release the innovative energy of individuals and
groups by preventing monopolies of power from squashing them. They use the integrated
intelligence of internal market systems to bring forth the highest and best use of
internal resources. The way to cure corporate bureaucracy is to break up functional and
staff monopolies and to then allow internal markets the free choice between different
providers to sort out what works within the mission and values of the organisation. If you
need software programming from within your organisation, choice between alternative
suppliers of software service will eliminate the bureaucratic response of, "we can
get to it in two years" and replace it with, "we want your business -- what do
we have to do to get it?"
4. Justice and equality
The democracy needed to use the creativity of all members involves their
direct personal participation in designing the factors that affect their work. Liberated
employees must be trusted to pursue the good of the system. They won't if the system is
not just. They won't if inequalities are so great they feel cheated. They won't if the few
are allowed to dominate the many, as they are in bureaucracies. Organisations designed to
bring out the responsibility and intelligence of every member will depend on internal
systems for guaranteeing justice. They protect employees from imbalances in power and
establish local systems to adjudicate disputes. Internal "laws" are needed when
actions repeatedly benefit the part at the expense of the whole. Justice and a body of
internal "law" create the context in which the many actions of enterprising
individuals and teams lead to a coherent order and productive outcome.
Rather than depend on bureaucratic supervision to prevent abuses,
intelligent organisations grant freedom limited by clearly stated laws and an effective
justice system. The result: more freedom for innovation and better control.
5. Processes for self-management
Involvement and self-management only happen when processes are in place to
support them. There is a rush of innovation in this area -- in new ways to involve more
people in decisions and to focus energy on what will serve customers and the business
environment rather than internal politics and internal convenience. Effective
self-managing processes engage people in collaboratively managing the whole.
Egalitarian teams innovate effectively because all voices are heard and
respected. The result is more new ideas implemented and fewer unthinking mistakes.
Intelligent organisations find ways to involve all employees in creating the larger
context for their work. As much as possible, consensus and consent guide the design of the
policies and institutions needed to steer the organisation toward fulfilling its common
mission. The result is systems, strategies, and policies respectful that employees need to
be productive and to keep trying new ideas to flourish in a constantly changing world.
6. Voluntary networks
To have a flexible and responsive organisation, intelligence must flow
from every member -- every person interacting in such a way as to create knowledge that is
rapidly disseminated and applied. Only a voluntary network can forge all the links needed
for such massive interconnection. No management could design a network of this fluid
complexity. It has to be spontaneously created by the choices of all the people
establishing the connections they need to get their work done.
Learning networks are most often established from informal connections.
People create learning networks by choosing who to learn from and partner with. Network
connections that require more extended services or the delivery of a steady stream of
components need more formal support, such as accounting mechanisms for one unit to pay
another for services rendered.
7. Limited corporate government
No society of any size exists without a government to ensure rights,
safety and other basics of the common good. No corporation can exist without its own
"government" at headquarters. The question, then, is what kind of
"government" to have? Should it be a bureaucracy -- a totalitarian government
where whatever the people at the top say goes? Or should the government have a more
limited role -- a role limited by the rights of its members and teams?
The central governments of intelligent organisations are limited in scope
and power because the role of the center is not to run the enterprises that together
deliver the mission nor to "supervise" those that do so. Rather the primary role
is to create the conditions that empower those doing the work to build systems to run
those businesses effectively and focus on pursuits that have positive synergy.
Today we are seeing a rapid decrease in the size and importance of the
Fortune 500 because bureaucracy limits the effective size of the corporate brain. Large
organisations will either learn to practice the seven essentials of organisational
intelligence or continue to shrink to a size suitable to an organisation of very limited
intelligence. Many current giants will die in the process, but a number will be reborn as
intelligent organisations with the ability to innovate and respond rapidly, and with all
the benefits of size as well.
Frank J. Adick, CSP, CMC (USA), is the Managing Director of Dew-Point
International Ltd. He can be reached at fjadick@dew-point.com.hk.
|