| e-CHAMBER
October 2000 Issue the bulletin
Dodging the Pitfalls of e-commerce
Law firm discusses misuse of
personal data and lack of
awareness of legally binding e-contracts on the Internet
The Internet has created unprecedented potential for the
misuse of personal data and databanks are making fortunes from businesses that are queuing
up to use such information to sell their products to millions of consumers worldwide.
Angus Forsyth (left), senior partner, Stevenson, Wong & Lai,
explained at the Chamber's Sept. 12 roundtable luncheon that while there is applicable
legislation in Hong Kong to provide some protection, on the whole, many of the regulations
here and abroad are e-pseudo laws or self-regulation when it comes to privacy of personal
data on the Internet.
Even when there are laws, Net users must take the
responsibility of protecting their own privacy interests, he said.
Personal data is a valuable resource and companies use it
to market their products to us often in the form of unsolicited e-mail, or SPAM. Control
of SPAM is on a voluntary basis, and the Hong Kong Internet Service Providers Association
(HKISPA) in February this year set up the Code of Practice on Anti-Spam, he said.
Hong Kong's Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO), which
came into effect in 1996, does try to regulate the protection of an individual's data.
But, "The PDPO is not a privacy protection ordinance.
There is no dedicated law in Hong Kong for that. The PDPO is a personal data privacy
ordinance, no more, no less," he said.
The details of the ordinance are spelled out in great
detail, and while it does carry criminal liability and penalties, they are often still
ignored, he said. (Full details of the ordinance can be found at
http://www.pco.org.hk/ord/index.html)
"Hong Kong does not yet have a substantial body of
reported personal data privacy case law and very limited significant civil case law upon
the Internet and personal Data Privacy," he said. "The future legal development
of this very exciting and extremely new goldmine cum minefield of commercial exploitation
will be littered with massive injuries and massive profits -- all of which will find
reflection in the courts."
The Electronic Transactions Ordinance (ETO)
Yvonne Chia (right), associate, Stevenson, Wong & Lai,
also speaking at the luncheon, said companies must be aware of the consequences of
entering into an electronic contract on the Internet.
The ETO gives electronic records and signatures the same
legal status as their paper counterparts, with the exception of wills, powers of attorney,
oaths, affidavits and a few other documents.
By legally binding a company to the terms of an online
contract, companies must make sure they have the last say in whether or not they enter
into a contract, she said.
She cited a case when a large U.K. retailer mistakenly
listed the price of a television set on its Web site as 2.99 pounds, instead of 299
pounds. In theory, the buyer could sue the company if it didn't sell the set for the
advertised price.
"By making sure you have the last say allows you to
filter out any error that might be present in the transaction," she said.
Other pitfalls could involve local laws. Most people here
are aware that Internet gambling is illegal in Hong Kong and so do not indulge, but the
sale of alcohol in Saudi Arabia, for example, is a criminal offence. If you sell a bottle
of scotch to someone there, you may be liable to prosecution.
Ms Chia suggests using a "shopping cart" system
for visitors to put goods that they wish to buy in their cart, which they can then pay for
or reject at the "check out." Here, you have the chance to say whether or not
you will sell those goods to the client.
But even before that happens, you should present clients
with an agreement stating that they are about to enter into a legally binding contract.
After clicking the agree button they can then choose to click on the "place your
order" button.
These may seem like common-sense measures, but as she
points out, common sense is not that common. |