Venture capitalists have resurfaced with renewed optimism on the growing
wave of economic recovery after years of disillusionment. They are also much wiser for the
wear to the point of almost being too cautious when it comes to making investments.
"A lot of venture capitalists that I know have not done deals for two
to three years," Martin Gagen Director of the Board, 3i Group, told the audience
during his luncheon presentation at the Venture Capital/Private Equity Partnership
Conference on September 22. "That might be a good thing if they are doing so because
they feel there is nothing worth investing in. But there is a danger that companies are
becoming gun-shy after big losses during the dot-com bubble."
He estimates that investments in companies in the United States have
fallen to about one-fifth of the rate from a few years ago. Part of the reason for the
plunge is that investors have "had a hell of a shock to the system. As a result, U.S.
investors are now very inward looking," he added.
He predicts their retraction from the global industry will open up more
opportunities for investors with a global vision and network. "As a result, there has
never been a better time to invest," he said.
A recent survey by Dibb Lupton Alsop shows that investor sentiment for the
remainder of the year and into the first half of 2004 is very optimistic. Some 75 percent
of venture capitalists polled in the Greater China region think the region will pick up
towards the end of the year, while 63 percent believe that the market for IPOs will
improve in the coming year.
Respondents overwhelmingly indicated that China remains is most popular
destination for investment focus, with 97 percent of investors indicating their interest
in the Mainland, with Shanghai (79 percent) Beijing (70 percent) and Guangzhou (61
percent) being the top three venture capital investment destinations.
Despite their bullishness on the China market, the main message echoing
throughout the day-long conference was the issue of corporate governance and the need for
greater transparency.
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Frederick Ma, in his
remarks at the conference, said the government has been taking a series of initiatives to
upgrade the corporate governance of listed companies and the quality of Hong Kong's equity
market.
"Together with the SFC and HKEx, we have drawn up a Corporate
Governance Action Plan early this year. Consultations have just been completed or are
being conducted on a number of proposals, notably the tightening of the regulation of IPO
intermediaries and a series of recommendations put forward in the Corporate Governance
Review Phase II Report of the Standing Committee on Company Law Reform. We will also
consult the public shortly on how to enhance the listing regime and to provide statutory
backing to listing rules," he said.
However, some members of the audience questioned the need for even
stricter regulations, and argued that better enforcement of existing regulations would be
more effective that simply adding more layers of red tape.
Herbert Hui, Chairman, The Hong Kong institute of Directors, said an
increase in the number of breaches of the rules is not indicative of success of the
Securities and Futures ordinance. Its success hinges upon the awareness and acceptance of
the regulations and the need for corporate governance development within the business
community.
"The cost of compliance must also be reasonable and outweigh the
benefits of raising corporate governance standards, especially during uncertain economic
times when companies are reluctant and perhaps unable to absorb the additional costs of
complying with corporate governance rules," he said.
An
interesting aspect of this year's conference was that some companies who had found backing
from venture capitalists shared their experiences with the audience. Yat Siu, CEO of
Outblaze, said it wasn't always smooth sailing with his venture capitalists. As speakers
had stressed during their talks at the conference, open communication was very important
in avoiding and solving problems, but occasionally, investors over-reacted to negative
news.
"When you have problems, you need to have a unified house," he
explained. "When the market went sour, outside shareholders were exerting pressure on
the company, which led to problems internally."
What his investors failed to realise, he believes, was that because
Outblaze was a small company, it didn't have the resources or expertise to produce all the
reports that the venture capitalists wanted.
"So for the first year we were looking far too much inside the
company to keep investors happy, instead of looking how we could grow the business and
expand sales," he said.
Frank Lai, CFO, Central Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation, in
sharing his experience, said that initially investors were very supportive and willing to
share their expertise, which benefited the company tremendously.
"During the first six months they love you and call you every week
and want to meet you every month," he said. "Suddenly, after four months, they
have other projects going on so they lose interest in you. So the trick is to keep their
interest in your company so that you can use their expertise."
Keeping their interest and being very transparent in sharing with
investors not only the good news but also the bad, paid off for the company during the
very difficult SARS crisis, he said.
He found that investors are also demanding more details about what is
going on in a company. Venture capitalists are no longer happy to receive a monthly
financial report, and take the CFO at this word.
"Now they call the production manager, or the sales manager to back
up what you say," Mr Lai said. "They also look into all aspects of your
operations and you have to keep them informed of what is going on. Sometimes we feel this
is a waste of time. But over the long term, if we don't meet these requirements now we
will struggle to get financing in the future."