Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce
Click here to login e-Club  Click here to visit our Chinese frontpage

Advertise
In the Bulletin

From the Chairman

Legco Report

From the Director

Cover Story
Beating heart disease

Special Feature  Working out in style

i-Perkin 
SAR trade slows as Mainland grows

Business
Promising first year for JBLC

Member Profile

Chamber Programmes
Mission to Henan and Anhui

Strength of success

Big industries' big pollution solutions

SME Night: Government procurement

Chamber in Action


ARCHIVES

2009 Issues
2008 Issues
2007 Issues
2006 Issues
2005 Issues
2004 Issues
2003 Issues
2002 Issues
2001 Issues
2000 Issues
1999 Issues

Search for

 
Advanced Search

SUBSCRIBE TO THE BULLETIN TODAY!

LEGCO REPORT                                                           May  2002 Issue


theBulletin.gif (2057 bytes)


Accountability system should help revitalise local economy

The Hon James Tien, the Chamber's Legco Rep, shares his personal views on the Principal Officials Accountability System which was unveiled by the Chief Executive in Legco on April 17

The government finally announced on April 17 details of its Principal Officials Accountability System after deliberating the issue for over a year. Under the system, 14 senior officials, including three secretaries of department and 11 directors of bureaux, will be appointed to cover respective portfolios assigned to them by the Chief Executive. I think the new system marks a major step forward for the HKSAR Administration, because it clarifies lines of responsibility and should also help invigorate Hong Kong's economy.

Under the government's previous "collective responsibility" system, basically no officials claimed responsibility for failure. As directors of bureaux are civil servants, they, in principle, have no political liability. Such blurred responsibilities created many problems, such as the short piling issue at public housing construction sites.

Administration affects businesses

As effective and efficient administration is the cornerstone of a conducive business environment, the government must move with the times and respond quickly to economic changes. To help businesses cope with the current economic transformation, it should introduce various measures to assist businesses and to help them sharpen their competitiveness.

Given the problems with the current civil service structure, the accountability system is clearly an improvement. However, my biggest concern is how the government will attract talent from the private sector to take up these positions as the quality of these people will play an important factor in the degree of success of the new system.

Recruiting outside talent will benefit the administration by bringing in expertise and experience in their respective areas, as well as creative ideas for formulating policies. Compared with career civil servants, they should have a better feel of the pulse of financial, business and economic affairs. Policies initiated by them will therefore be more responsive to economic needs.

I don't think appointed officials will be too concerned about remuneration packages in deciding whether to join the government or not. But I believe their biggest concerns will be whether or not they are given sufficient room for realising their goals, and possible constraints on joining and leaving the civil service. As set out in the proposal, candidates will have to pass background checks and a physical examination. This is common practice, but I feel the regulations that they have to conform to upon resignation are too harsh.

Ease restrictions on leaving

The government has proposed that bureau directors cannot return to their profession within one year of leaving the civil service. If they go into business in the period, they must seek advice from a special committee. Such a draconian requirement would only discourage talent from entering the civil service, so I hope the government will consider shortening the one-year requirement to ensure it attracts the best talent.

I also think the government needs to improve co-ordination between the Executive and Legislative councils to ensure the system operates smoothly. The government's failure to gain adequate votes to pass policies in Legco has, to a certain extent, made policy implementation difficult.

If legislators belonging to political parties are appointed to the Executive Council and discuss policies with bureau directors, proposed policies will more likely be supported and passed in Legco more easily. This, in turn, will enable bureau directors to implement policies more efficiently and effectively.

I disagree with those who criticise that the system will merely give the Chief Executive greater powers, because the Basic Law already confers all administrative powers on the Chief Executive. Many democratic countries like the U.S. and the U.K. have similar inner power groups for their top leaders and they function well.

If anyone intends to make this an excuse to hinder the implementation of the system, the community will oppose them.

The earlier the better

As I mentioned earlier, the introduction of the accountability system on July 1 should be implemented as soon as possible in view of the social and economic benefits that it will be able to bring to Hong Kong. Nevertheless, Legco is still responsible for examining related regulations cautiously to avoid any loopholes in the law, and as such I have joined a special Legco committee to scrutinise the system and I will keep you informed of the progress.

The above are my own personal views. If you have any comments, please send them to me directly at, Legislative Council Building, 8 Jackson Road, Central, Hong Kong. Or email me at tpc@jamestien.com. Tel. 2500 1013, Fax 2368 5292.

About HKGCC | Member Services | Join Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Jobs
The Chamber's Privacy Policy Statement
Copyright © 1998-2009 The Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce. All Rights Reserved.