LEGCO REPORT
May 2002 Issue

Accountability system should help revitalise
local economy
The Hon James Tien, the Chamber's
Legco Rep, shares his personal views on the Principal Officials Accountability System
which was unveiled by the Chief Executive in Legco on April 17
The government finally announced on April 17 details of its Principal
Officials Accountability System after deliberating the issue for over a year. Under the
system, 14 senior officials, including three secretaries of department and 11 directors of
bureaux, will be appointed to cover respective portfolios assigned to them by the Chief
Executive. I think the new system marks a major step forward for the HKSAR Administration,
because it clarifies lines of responsibility and should also help invigorate Hong Kong's
economy.
Under the government's previous "collective responsibility"
system, basically no officials claimed responsibility for failure. As directors of bureaux
are civil servants, they, in principle, have no political liability. Such blurred
responsibilities created many problems, such as the short piling issue at public housing
construction sites.
Administration
affects businesses
As effective and efficient administration is the cornerstone of a
conducive business environment, the government must move with the times and respond
quickly to economic changes. To help businesses cope with the current economic
transformation, it should introduce various measures to assist businesses and to help them
sharpen their competitiveness.
Given the problems with the current civil service structure, the
accountability system is clearly an improvement. However, my biggest concern is how the
government will attract talent from the private sector to take up these positions as the
quality of these people will play an important factor in the degree of success of the new
system.
Recruiting outside talent will benefit the administration by bringing in
expertise and experience in their respective areas, as well as creative ideas for
formulating policies. Compared with career civil servants, they should have a better feel
of the pulse of financial, business and economic affairs. Policies initiated by them will
therefore be more responsive to economic needs.
I don't think appointed officials will be too concerned about remuneration
packages in deciding whether to join the government or not. But I believe their biggest
concerns will be whether or not they are given sufficient room for realising their goals,
and possible constraints on joining and leaving the civil service. As set out in the
proposal, candidates will have to pass background checks and a physical examination. This
is common practice, but I feel the regulations that they have to conform to upon
resignation are too harsh.
Ease
restrictions on leaving
The government has proposed that bureau directors cannot return to their
profession within one year of leaving the civil service. If they go into business in the
period, they must seek advice from a special committee. Such a draconian requirement would
only discourage talent from entering the civil service, so I hope the government will
consider shortening the one-year requirement to ensure it attracts the best talent.
I also think the government needs to improve co-ordination between the
Executive and Legislative councils to ensure the system operates smoothly. The
government's failure to gain adequate votes to pass policies in Legco has, to a certain
extent, made policy implementation difficult.
If legislators belonging to political parties are appointed to the
Executive Council and discuss policies with bureau directors, proposed policies will more
likely be supported and passed in Legco more easily. This, in turn, will enable bureau
directors to implement policies more efficiently and effectively.
I disagree with those who criticise that the system will merely give the
Chief Executive greater powers, because the Basic Law already confers all administrative
powers on the Chief Executive. Many democratic countries like the U.S. and the U.K. have
similar inner power groups for their top leaders and they function well.
If anyone intends to make this an excuse to hinder the implementation of
the system, the community will oppose them.
The
earlier the better
As I mentioned earlier, the introduction of the accountability system on
July 1 should be implemented as soon as possible in view of the social and economic
benefits that it will be able to bring to Hong Kong. Nevertheless, Legco is still
responsible for examining related regulations cautiously to avoid any loopholes in the
law, and as such I have joined a special Legco committee to scrutinise the system and I
will keep you informed of the progress.
The above are my own personal views. If you have any comments, please send
them to me directly at, Legislative Council Building, 8 Jackson Road, Central, Hong Kong.
Or email me at tpc@jamestien.com. Tel. 2500 1013,
Fax 2368 5292. |