LEGCO REPORT
March 2002 Issue

Economic situation should be weighed when
addressing deficit
By James Tien
The HKSAR Financial Secretary Antony Leung delivered his first ever Budget on March 6. At
the time of writing, details of the Budget had yet to be released, but it was expected to
address Hong Kong's structural deficit, as hinted by the findings of the government's
"Task Force on Review of Public Finances," led by the Secretary for the Treasury
Denis Yu.
The report predicts the deficit for 2001-02
will reach HK$66 billion, and warned that Hong Kong has a structural rather than a
cyclical budget deficit. Failure to implement effective measures will result in the
government's fiscal reserves drying up within seven years, the report said. The government
will then be forced to operate on loans, which will amount to HK$2,661 billion by 2021-22.
Report too pessimistic
Facing such horrifying figures, I believe the Task Force is being too
pessimistic and over simplifying issues. It is unreasonable and unjustifiable to base
their findings only on negative factors without considering such conducive elements as
China's WTO entry and the proposed Mainland-Hong Kong "Closer Economic Partnership
Arrangement," or (CEPA). Their forecast about the property and securities markets are
similarly too pessimistic, and even overlook variables that may arise in the exchange rate
peg, assuming it will be maintained for the next 20 years.
The goal of releasing such a pessimistic report was perhaps to persuade
both Legco and the general public to accept yet-to-be-announced fiscal measures. However,
the "Cry Wolf" story it created could also scare off investors and possibly
lower Hong Kong's credit rating.
Notwithstanding the problems with the survey, the government's
determination to address the budget deficit is clear. The Chief Executive and the
Financial Secretary indicated that the government planned to solve the issue within five
years. To achieve a balanced Budget, the government needs to increase income or trim
expenditure by HK$35 billion annually. In deliberating how to accomplish this, the
government, in my view, should take into consideration a number of issues.
First of all, Hong Kong's business climate is still weak. Our GDP
registered negative growth for the past two consecutive quarters, and unemployment reached
a record high of 6.7 per cent. Although the government does need to address the deficit,
now is not the right time to introduce any new taxes or increase fees, which would only
hamper recovery of the economy. Instead, it should wait until the local economy improves,
which will also put it in a better position to discuss and adjust its income policies.
More resources to boost the economy
For the near future, the government should commit more resources towards
improving the business environment and to stimulate the economy. A few months ago, I
convened a meeting with eight Legco parties and we put forward seven initiatives to the
government to help improve the economy. Our proposed expenditure of HK$25 billion is
affordable in view of the current fiscal reserves. The government can have more income
only when the economy recovers and the business environment improves. I hope such measures
will be considered in the coming Budget as they are short-term plans which are unlikely to
put pressure on the government's coffers.
In addition to allocating more resources, the government should also
drastically cut unnecessary expenditure. As I have said time and again, the government
spends too much. The Task Force also admitted in its report that the growth of government
expenditure in recent years exceeds that of the economy. Continued deflation has further
deepened this gap and exacerbated pressure on its fiscal reserves.
Cap public expenditure
The share of public expenditure over the past 10 years has ballooned from
14 per cent of GDP in 1998 to the current 23 per cent, contradicting the idea of
maintaining a small government. I think the government should immediately address the
situation by capping public expenditure at 18 to 20 per cent of GDP. It should set
benchmarks to steer clear from overspending like many developed countries have done.
The government should also cut expenses in relation to civil service and
employees of subsidized organizations, which accounts for 70 per cent of its recurrent
expenditure. Apart from cutting civil service payroll and streamlining its structure, the
government must outsource more services and push forward its Enhanced Productivity
Programme to save costs. I believe the government can ease its financial burden with
comprehensive, and rigorous cost-cutting measures. Failure to do so will result in the
business community and the public having to carry the burden, which would only drag the
economy further down. |