|
LEGCO REPORT
March 2001 Issue

Prompt solution to
ease negative equity plight needed
Among the issues which have aroused much public attention in the past month is the
internal transfer of senior government officials. As I wrote in last month's Bulletin,
I believe the appointment of Donald Tsang as Chief Secretary is a good choice.
I hope that after taking over as the new head of the Civil Service, he
will improve relations between executive and legislative authorities, and better
coordinate execution of policies. I also think the appointment of Anthony Leung, who has a
commercial background, is a worth successor to Mr Tsang. Given the depth of his knowledge
of local business, I believe he can deliver policies to further economic growth.
As Hong Kong's economy has yet to fully recover, a prime objective of
the new new secretaries should be to quicken the pace of economic recovery. Many factors
have contributed to the economic doldrums, among which is the issue of negative equity.
Negative equity curbs domestic
consumption
It is estimated that nearly 300,000 home owners in Hong
Kong are suffering from negative equity -- meaning their mortgages are worth more than
their apartments. Such a situation obviously dampens retail sentiment and further pushes
down consumption. Several recent surveys illustrate that negative equity is a chief cause
for falling consumer spending, despite the rising confidence in the economy in recent
months.
As Mr Leung said, home owners suffering
from negative equity is one of the unstable factors affecting the Hong Kong economy. To
accelerate a full-scale recovery, the SAR Government must take practicable measures.
Though I have advised the government on possible courses of action many times, only
recently has it announced that it plans to take measures to try and ease the situation.
These include raising the flexibility in land supply, reducing the number of home
ownership flats for sale and tightening the application criteria for such flats. But I
consider that these measures are still inadequate, and as such have presented three more
recommendations to the government.
First, the government must clarify its long-term housing policy and
study whether construction of home ownership flats is contradictory to the underlying
rationale. During the years when property prices rose considerably, construction of
semi-financed home ownership flats encouraged public housing tenants to buy their own home
and free up their flats to those really in need. Today, property prices have fallen
considerably and I think the value of home ownership flats will compete with those of the
private sector.
Second, the Monetary Authority should encourage banks to adopt a more
relaxed approach towards mortgage rates. For example, it should provide a transition
period for discrepancies between mortgage rates and market prices, in addition to the
temporary arrangement of allowing the owners in need to repay the principal, but not the
interest, of the loan. Third, the Monetary Authority should encourage local banks to
implement identical mortgage policies for new and second-hand flats. This would stimulate
the second-hand market and reduce pressure on homeowners with negative equity.
Legco will debate the negative equity issue in the near future, and I
will keep you informed of the outcome.
Container handling fees dispute
The five-day blockade of container ports by lorry drivers
after refusing to pay extra container handling fees also aroused much public debate.
I understand that the industry suffered considerable losses during the
dispute and I am glad that the related parties reached a resolution to avoid even greater
losses.
During a recent Legco Economic Affairs Committee meeting, a member
proposed investigating whether container operators collaborated to raise charges, and
whether the current charge mechanism can be monitored.
However, I object to hastily making a decision of such monitoring,
because government intervention won't be as flexible and effective as free market
regulation. Also, I think if shippers find fees too high, they will consider using other
ports, such as Yentian in the Mainland. Therefore, operators know fees must be maintained
at a reasonable level due to competing ports.
Employment (Amendment)(No. 2) Bill
2000
I believe the other issue of concern is the proposal of the
government to amend legislation to improve protection of pregnant employees from
groundless dismissal. But I find the amendments unfair to employers. In fact, there are
already laws that protect pregnant employees from unreasonable dismissal. Only for gross
acts of misconduct like fraud or dereliction of duty can an employer propose dismissal,
according to the Employment Ordinance No. 9.
The government is planning to amend the existing legislation, and is
suggesting that employers can even be prosecuted if they are deemed to have fired an
employee without sufficient grounds for dismissal.
I think the threat of criminal prosecution will pose a great deal of
pressure on employers. The government is obviously giving employees preferential treatment
on this issue as they can sue employers who fail to employ the legislation. I will keep a
close eye on this issue and welcome your opinions.
|