BUSINESS
June 2002
Issue

Avoid becoming a victim of corruption
To help companies put in place internal controls and
safeguards against corruption and malpractice, the ICAC provides tailor-made corruption
prevention advice free of charge
A recent survey undertaken by the Political and Economic Risks Consultancy
ranked Hong Kong as the third least corrupt place in Asia.
The survey, which interviewed 1,000 foreign businessmen working in Asia,
illustrates the territory's openness and adherence to sound business principles. But it
does not mean that the territory is devoid of corruption.
During the past decade, more than half of the corruption complaints
received by the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) involved the private
sector, and the trend appears to be on the rise.
The most common cases involve soliciting illegal commission, splitting
inflated procurement prices, disclosing privileged information for personal gain, theft of
company property, falsifying accounting records and abuse of authority.
All these problems illustrate the need for private companies to be more
wary about the way they go about their businesses. In many cases, it also shows there is a
need for effective internal systems and controls.
To encourage and help private companies put in place internal controls and
safeguards against corruption and malpractice, the Advisory Services Group of the
Corruption Prevention Department of the ICAC provides tailor-made corruption prevention
advice to private companies.
The following three cases illustrate clearly just how easy it is for
companies to unwittingly become "victims of corruption."
Case 1 -- Merchandising
For quality assurance, an international buying office has the practice of
placing repeat orders from buyers with the previous supplier. A merchandiser of the Hong
Kong office took advantage of this practice by soliciting a discount from the supplier in
return for placing the order with him, but he billed the buyer the same unit price as the
first order and pocketed the difference.
The company was advised to establish procurement guidelines specifying the
minimum number of quotations to be obtained for different values and categories of
products available in the market. As prices may change over time, the company was also
advised to create a timetable specifying the period that the prices would be valid for.
The company was further advised to establish a regular liaison channel with its suppliers
to maintain a good business relationship and uncover any abnormal activities of its staff.
Case 2 -- Tendering
In administering a tender exercise for the supply of frozen food, the chef
of a restaurant, in return for monetary gains, disclosed the tender prices of other
tenderers to one of the bidders.
The company was advised to step up its tender collection procedures to
ensure the security and confidentiality of the tenders received. It was also suggested
that tenders received should be opened in one go by a tender opening team comprising of at
least two persons. In the selection of tenders, they should be systematically assessed to
ensure value for money as well as avoid favouritism. The company was also advised to draw
up a code of conduct for compliance by staff in which the company's policy on acceptance
of advantages and confidentiality of information were clearly stated.
Case 3 -- Purchasing
A purchasing manager of a department store, in collusion with a warehouse
keeper, falsified stock records to steal valuable items.
The company was advised to set up a proper inventory control system
covering receipt of goods and disposal of old stock and damaged goods. The company was
also advised to conduct random stock checks by an independent third party in addition to
routine stocktakes by the warehouse staff.
Conclusion
Corruption and malpractice will not
only lead to higher operating costs and loss of profit for a company, but will also
tarnish its reputation and image. To remain competitive and to reap the benefits of every
business opportunity, local businesses should seriously consider whether they have
adequately put in place systems and controls to guard against abuse and malpractice. They
should also consider whether their staff have received appropriate training in corruption
prevention and are aware of the pitfalls of corruption as well as the anti-corruption
laws.
Advisory Services Group
The Advisory Services Group has extensive experience in providing
corruption prevention advice on system controls. Since its establishment in 1985, the
group has advised more than 3,000 companies, covering a variety of businesses. The advice
given by the group is tailor-made, free of charge and in strict confidence. The company
also has full discretion to decide whether or not to act on the group's advice.
Call 2526 6363, fax 2522 0505 or email asgicac@netvigator.com for more information about
the groups service. We pledge to respond to requests within two working days.
Provided by the Advisory Services Group
of the Corruption Prevention Department of the ICAC. |