The economic rebound in 1999, which has extended into the
first quarter of the new year (the last quarter of the Governments fiscal year) has
helped ease the budgetary challenges for 2000-2001. So, too, has the recovery in the
securities markets and the stabilisation of the property market.
Higher levels of economic activity should have enhanced Government revenues and reduced
the projected budget deficit for the 1999-2000 fiscal year from the original $36 billion
forecast. Nevertheless, the SARs financial secretary remains concerned about future
budget revenues and the need to fund the Governments substantial, medium term
expenditure plans, especially in new infrastructure projects.
This is understandable given the impact on Government revenues of the economic downturn
which hit Hong Kong in the final quarter of 1997 and extended throughout 1998 and into the
opening months of 1999. Moreover, the impact was particularly severe on the property
market and, hence, saw a reduction in land revenues previously anticipated by the
Government.
At the same time, the Government has been proceeding with large and costly
infrastructure projects and these will continue to require spending allocations in the
years immediately ahead. The advent of the Disney project with its substantial Government
commitments of equity, loan funds and infrastructure spending, has added to these.
Successive financial secretaries over the past decade and half have also slimmed down
the tax base, both by getting rid of some troublesome indirect taxes and by dropping
potential tax payers out of the tax net altogether, especially the salaries tax net. This
fiscal year, for example, there are estimated to be only 1.3 million salary tax payers out
of a total workforce of almost 3.5 million. Furthermore only 5 per cent of them paid tax
at the standard rate of 15 per cent.
In terms of overall revenues, the financial secretary will gain in the short term from
the partial privatisation of the MTRC but this will have only a "one-off"
impact. It is for these reasons that he has apparently decided to re-examine the
Governments revenue base to assess whether it fits with likely future revenue needs
and whether Hong Kong needs a broader and more stable revenue source.
In its own Budget Submission for 2000-2001, which was delivered to the financial
secretary on Nov. 12, the Chamber put forward a lengthy series of requests for tax
changes, although it stressed that it did not expect them to be granted in one budget
year. Almost all of them were aimed at making the tax system more competitive regionally,
boosting Government policy commitments and increasing the level of certainty in the
system.
Commenting on the issue of broadening the tax base, the Chamber said in its submission:
"We therefore propose that (a) the Government consider reversing the policy of
continually narrowing the base for collection of existing taxes (effectively dropping tax
payers from the tax net) and (b) open up the debate on the need for a more broadly-based
taxation system.
"
In the past, the financial secretary has ruled out certain options as far
as taxation is concerned. We believe that all options should be "on the table"
as far as discussion and debate are concerned, especially in regard to likely future
Government revenue needs and whether existing taxes also need to be reviewed. It is only
in this way that the Government and the community can fully debate the issues involved and
decide what is best for the future of the Hong Kong taxation system."
Given the financial secretarys excellent track record in budgeting
in both good and bad times, the Chamber looks forward to another prudent budget on March
8. We expect a budget that addresses the needs of Hong Kong both in the provision of
services to the local community and in ensuring the tax and other revenue demands on the
business community are not made more onerous than they already are.
By CC Tung, Chairman, HKGCC