Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce
Click here to login e-Club  Click here to visit our Chinese frontpage

Advertise
In the Bulletin

From the Chairman

Legco Report

From the Director

Cover Story

The great 'China Gold Rush'

Putting trade negotiations back on track

Hong Kong-Mainland RTA

i-Perkin 

Zeroing in on 'zero' interest

Face to Face

With Sylvia Chiu

Business
More companies moving to Hong Kong and Mainland China

Hong Kong aiming to be Asia's future exhibition centre

SME funding scheme to be launched in January 2002

Expanding
HK-Taipei Cooperation


Profiting from the Olympics

WTO Corner


Member Profile

Chamber Programmes
Are there things we can learn from Singapore?

VCs holding onto money

China driving Asia forward

SC banking on the Mainland China market

Clean Production Awards

Busy start for WEC members

Wine Review


ARCHIVES

2008 Issues
2007 Issues
2006 Issues
2005 Issues
2004 Issues
2003 Issues
2002 Issues
2001 Issues
2000 Issues
1999 Issues

Search for

 
Advanced Search

SUBSCRIBE TO THE BULLETIN TODAY!

CHAMBER PROGRAMMES                                 December  2001 Issue


theBulletin.gif (2057 bytes)


Are there things we can learn from Singapore?

singapore.jpg (54890 bytes)

The Chamber's recent mission to Singapore discovered that although the city-state may be eating bitter fruit, it is wasting no time laying the foundations of future economic growth

By Christopher Cheng

People are correct when they say that comparing Singapore and Hong Kong is like comparing apples and oranges. Singapore's system and society are very different from those of Hong Kong. But are there things we can learn from the city-state? To find out the answer, the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce recently sent a 30-person delegation to Singapore, to try to understand the economic policy and situation there, to see what business opportunities exist, and to look at the role of the government there concerning the business community.

The delegates came from the technology, property, manufacturing, retail, investment, media, academic, and consulting sectors, and had access to all Singapore's senior leaders. And we found that there are, indeed, lessons to be learned.

In Hong Kong, we do not want our economy planned to the extent of Singapore. But we must admire the Singapore ministers' constant search for a vision and belief in their policies. There is a sense of direction, a sense of focus, and a sense of commitment.

At the same time, we also found a willingness to re-examine and re-evaluate policies, and readjust them and reset goals if needed. Finally, the marketing and image-building of its vision is very effective internally and externally.

Our job here in Hong Kong is easier in one way, more difficult in another. More difficult because we have a vibrant society with a lively political landscape and a noisy press. The "executive-led" system of government belies the difficulty of persuading public opinion and different interest groups to support the policy direction. But we can still act resolutely. It may be difficult but it is not impossible.

It means we have to be responsive, as well as self-confident. We have to be careful how we explain policies and how we implement them. We should not underestimate the ability of Hong Kong people to rally together, even in tough times.

On the other hand, our job here is easier because we have some natural advantages over Singapore, the most obvious and important one being our proximity to, and relationship with, the mainland. Hong Kongs position in the market is also fairly clear.

We do not have to build a brand new pillar of the economy -- like "bio-technology" -- as Singapore has to do.

It is widely accepted here that we can be a logistics hub for China, an international financial centre, a tourist destination, and a services bridge between China and the outside world. We do not need an industrial policy. But we do need to nurture the businesses in sectors that help our positioning.

When it comes to information technology (IT), Singapore places heavy emphasis on education and research. It knows that it has to attract talent from all over the world. Hong Kong is pushing ahead with much needed education reform and is now finally trying to attract mainland talent in IT and financial services.

But we should be bolder. We need to open up more to all talent in all sectors from all places, and we need to impress upon our population that this would create more jobs.

Singapore, despite its deteriorating economy, is still doing everything it can to import talent because it understands that this has a multiplying effect as far as job creation is concerned. It even goes so far as not giving Singaporeans priority in the hunt for jobs. We should not do that here, as Hong Kong people should have first priority, but we can be more aggressive in attracting talent from everywhere in the world, especially from the mainland.

It is clear, having spoken to the Singaporean leaders, that they envy our position and worry about their own future now China's entry into the World Trade Organisation (WTO) has been approved.

Our people's anxiety about China's WTO entry is tiny compared to Singapore's. Our inter-relationship with the mainland commercially is so deep that our integration economically ought to be natural. In fact, Singaporean leaders believe there should be more co-operation between Hong Kong and Singapore, with Hong Kong bringing to the table precisely this inter-relationship with the mainland. They are an "outsider" to China, whereas, under the "one country, two systems" principle, we can be both an "outsider" and an "insider" to China at the same time.

To develop that, our government must act faster in devising policies that enhance our economic integration with the mainland. For example, 24-hour border crossing which no doubt would cause some short-term pain to a small segment of society -- should not be viewed as a long-term goal but as an urgent goal.

The perception is that the SAR Government does not have a sufficient sense of urgency. Caution is good, but not at the expense of timely action. We can think of ways to both maintain the "one country, two systems" principle and yet get closer to China economically with more frequent dialogue and co-ordination. Otherwise, we will miss out on the chance of co-operating and working in synergy with the mainland, which is destined to explode in growth for decades.

We in the business community believe our government should be more proactive.

At a recent conference, the following problem was posed. "If China is feeling so good, why is Hong Kong feeling so bad?" The solution lies in finding mutually beneficial ways with the Mainland to capture the opportunities brought about by China's WTO membership. Only then can Hong Kong business people take advantage of new openings, something we do better than any other business people on earth.

Christopher Cheng is the Chairman of the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce

This article first appeared in the South China Morning Post on November 22, 2001.

About HKGCC | Member Services | Join Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Jobs
The Chamber's Privacy Policy Statement
Copyright © 1998-2008 The Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce. All Rights Reserved.