LEGCO REPORT
August
2001 Issue

Helping SMEs sharpen their competitiveness
By James Tien
I am delighted that Beijing has been
chosen to host the 2008 Olympic Games, after years of sweat and tears bidding for the
games. This is an unprecedented opportunity for the Mainland, which, to a large extent,
demonstrates China's growing economic status. Given that Beijing will host the world's largest sporting event, China's imminent entry into the World Trade
Organisation and the western region development project, the Mainland economy looks set to
skyrocket in the coming years.
Unquestionably, the Mainland market offers
great potential, and because many companies want to profit from its development,
competition in the country has intensified. I believe that, like me, the local sector is
anxious to learn how Hong Kong companies can boost their competitiveness and seize
possible business opportunities in China.
Finding opportunities
Chief Secretary for Administration Donald Tsang said that he will lead
various government departments ' efforts
to assess what opportunities are expected to arise for Hong Kong firms in the run up to
the Olympic Games in Beijing. But I think this is inadequate.
Six months ago, I recommended that the government commission an
independent international consultant firm to examine consumer markets in major Mainland
cities in view of China 's
imminent WTO entry and its development of the west. The study would also explore business
opportunities for local SMEs, based on business scope and nature, identify ways that Hong
Kong businesses could stay ahead of foreign companies in the Mainland, and how we can play
a pivotal middleman role.
Now that Beijing will host the 2008 Olympic Games, I urge the government
to go ahead with the study, which is vital to SMEs, because they lack resources to
identify ways in which to penetrate the China market. Though SMEs are the economic pillars
of Hong Kong, they usually lack knowledge of the Mainland market and the resources to
enhance productivity and competitive power.
More support for SMEs
Last month, the government 's Small and Medium Enterprises Committee released its report on support measures
for SMEs. After an initial review, I found the government needs to conduct more in-depth
studies in several areas.
In addition to suggesting a series of support measures, the report also
recommends allocating HK$1.3 billion to set up four funding schemes, namely: SME Business
Installations and Equipment Loan Guarantee Scheme, SME Development Fund, SME Training Fund
and SME Export Marketing Fund.
For the SME Business Installations and Equipment Loan Guarantee Scheme,
the committee recommended allocating HK$0.5 billion to help SMEs secure bank loans so that
they can refit or upgrade their businesses to enhance their competitiveness. Each SME will
be able to obtain a guarantee equivalent to 50 per cent of the approved loan, with the
maximum amount set at HK$500,000. However, I think the maximum loan amount of HK$1 million
from banks is not enough to purchase advanced equipment. Besides, only about 6,600 SMEs
are able to benefit from the scheme, which is just a small proportion of the 290,000 SMEs
in Hong Kong. The government must therefore consider allocating more resources to raise
the guarantee ceiling to increase the number of beneficiaries.
Raise loan ceiling, lower interest rates
After consulting committee members in
the banking field, I learned that interest rates for the loan will be P+3 or higher. If
true, this is obviously too high and will put SMEs off applying for a loan. In my opinion,
since the government has promised to offer a loan guarantee and banks only need to bear
limited risk, the interest rate should be lowered. The government must discuss this with
the banks to maintain a reasonable interest rate of P+1.
I also doubt the effectiveness of the training fund. The committee
recommended a maximum subsidy for each successful application of HK$10,000 for employees
and HK$5,000 for an employer. Such a low sum means that possibly not all employees in the
firm will be able to apply for training. Moreover, the employer may be unwilling to give
employees time off for training.
The government must also ensure that the application procedure is user
friendly. Otherwise, like similar initiatives in the past, the complicated and draconian
rules will make SMEs shy away from applying for a loan. This in turn will fail to help
alleviate problems facing SMEs and dampen the entire economy. |