COVER STORY
August 2002
Issue

HKSAR's future role in the
PRD
Hong Kong has more to fear from irrational pessimism than the
competitive economic threat from the north, say leading business figures
Debates
on whether or not cities north of Hong Kong will take over the territory and leave it to
fade into an empty shell have been raging for decades, Goldman Sachs's head of Greater
China research Fred Hu Zuliu, told the audience during the final session of the
conference.
Speaking on "The Role of the PRD in China," Dr Hu said such
fears have been talked about for so long that it was getting ridiculous, and likened the
"perceived" Hong Kong border to the North and South Korea divide.
The exuberant confidence and optimism exhibited by people on the Mainland,
not least cities in the PRD, add to Hong Kong's fears that the cities are potent threats
to the SAR economy. But Dr Hu described them as pupils of Hong Kong's free-wheeling
economy, many of whom have graduated and become tutors to other cities on the Mainland.
He said concerns that China's WTO entry last year might diminish Hong
Kong's role as an entry port and its share of China's trade and investment were overly
pessimistic. "The absolute volume is bound to increase rapidly on the back of
expansion of China's total foreign trade and capital flows," he said.
Similarly,
Tung Chee-chen, chairman and CEO, Orient Overseas (International) Ltd, said during his
address that he found comparisons between Hong Kong and Shanghai equally amusing.
While both cities are economic power-houses, they both serve different
regions. "Hong Kong continues to be the most important gateway to Mainland China as
well as a commercial and financial centre for the Asia-Pacific Region, while Shanghai is
one of the most important gateways to central China and the premiere domestic capital
market to the Mainland," he said.
Shanghai will continue to attract multinationals looking to capture
business on the Mainland, but Hong Kong remains the preferred location for regional
headquarters with wider responsibilities and activities including finance and logistics.
The notion that Hong Kong and Shanghai are competing for cargo shipments
is also just not true, because each area serves different cargo catchment areas.
"In terms of competition, Hong Kong's main rivals are those container
terminals in neighbouring Guangdong Province across the border, while Shanghai competes
with its own regional rivals such as Ningbo," Mr Tung said.
Shanghai's heavy investments to become a trade, finance, and logistics
hub, at first glance, imply direct competition with Hong Kong. But Mr Tung said he
challenges such conclusions, and advances "that Hong Kong and Shanghai do not and
will not directly compete with each other."
One of the main reasons for this is because each city has its own
hinterland, and the differences between the customer bases of the two cities discourage
direct competition. Secondly, he thinks given the Shanghai government's recent
announcement of its six pillar industries, it is unlikely that Shanghai will abandon its
entire industrial base in favour of becoming a service economy like Hong Kong. And
thirdly, the fact that Hong Kong and Shanghai today possess different skill sets and areas
of expertise, the two cities possess a potentially powerful partnership that will be of
mutual benefit.
"The Hong Kong businessman is bringing valuable international
business experience to the manufacturing and consumer sector in Shanghai, while
Shanghai-based companies continue to come to Hong Kong for more sophisticated financial
structuring and capital raising exercises," he said.
Moreover, the development of Shanghai is being partly fuelled by
investments from Hong Kong. "Hong Kong not only serves as Shanghai's largest investor
accounting for some 30 per cent of FDI into China, but also supplies Shanghai with its
management expertise and business experience," Mr Tung said.
Commenting on competition within the PRD, Mr Tung said he believes
competition ultimately leads to increased efficiency. One of the key areas where
efficiency can be achieved is if Hong Kong and other businesses in the Pearl River Delta
can better integrate themselves to create a seamless logistic supply chain originating
from the manufacturing facilities and ending on the shelves of the customer in the U.S.,
Europe or Asia.
"It is critical for Hong Kong government, working under the "one
country two systems" concept, to further integrate Hong Kong into the Pearl River
Delta system, and ensure even more efficient flow of people, goods and services between
the border," he said.
But to achieve that, all parties need to work together with a higher
degree of cohesiveness and ensure greater cooperation across the border.
Stanley
Ko, chairman of Hong Kong Coalition of Service Industries and Jardine Matheson (China),
said the implementation of the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA) would help
realise economic integration between Hong Kong and China. "More liberal trade and
investment between Hong Kong and the Mainland will facilitate integration between the
two," he said.
But he stressed that CEPA is not just Mainland China giving Hong Kong
benefits; China itself will benefit, for example, by making it easier to attract Hong Kong
and foreign investment into China.
Mr Ko expressed the business sector's wish that talks on phase one of
CEPA, which focuses on easier issues, can be finished by the end of 2002, while the more
difficult subjects in the services sector like finance and telecom, can be left to phase
two.
Zero tariff free trade area is the main target for liberalisation on trade
in goods between Hong Kong and the Mainland. That means no more duty on goods exported
from Hong Kong to the Mainland and vice versa. Only goods manufactured in Hong Kong can
benefit from zero tariffs. This means that the rules of origin become important, he said.
"On services, we seek early application of the (WTO) commitments that
China has already made," Mr Ko said. "For example, China will liberalise product
coverage of retail sectors in five years. If through CEPA Hong Kong can get this treatment
earlier, Hong Kong should have a time advantage of four years -- assuming that we can
agree by the end of 2002."
Although CEPA would cover the whole of China, because Hong Kong is part of
the PRD, the immediate effect of CEPA will be closer integration of the PRD before the
integration spreads to other regions.
"Hong Kong and the PRD relationship is that of concurrent economic
restructuring through integration and division of labour. This process of front-shop
end-factory has been going on and the restructuring will continue with or without
CEPA," Mr Ko said. "However, with CEPA this restructuring process will be much
quicker."
| Tomorrow's environment as a competitive advantage
Hong Kong and the PRD are the light manufacturing giants of the world, said
Christine Loh Kung-wai, chief executive officer of public policy think-tank Civic
Exchange.
"The fact that our goods can compete in the U.S. with goods that are
made in Mexico, and get our goods there faster speaks volumes about our light
industries," she said.
But being good in light industries does not mean being cheap. Those days
are long gone. Where Hong Kong's expertise lies is in its sophistication and in its
efficiency. But to ensure it retains its crown as the light manufacturing giant of the
world, businesses need to upgrade themselves and increase their value by becoming more
efficient, she said.
That includes everything from reducing the quantity of materials used to
produce and package goods -- and by using sustainable materials -- to delivery of goods
and logistics -- but just not in terms of speed but efficiency.
"Efficiency is the way forward for Hong Kong. It is stupid that a
24-hour border crossing is still not possible and there are long queues of trucks waiting
for customs clearances," she said.
She also urged businesses to treat the economy as a subset of the
environment, because if we pollute our air and water, and use up all our natural
resources, "then what are we going to base our industries on?"
|
|