LEGCO REPORT
July 2001 Issue

Public money must not be squandered on pay
rises
By James Tien
During the recent recession, many companies in Hong Kong were forced to cut employees' pay and reduce the number of staff on their
payroll. Although the economy is now showing signs of recovery, I know many companies,
especially the small and medium enterprises, are still struggling. Statistics show that
only a small proportion of employees this year received a pay rise, which averaged 2 per
cent. Civil service pay rises, by contrast, are far higher than the average rate, and this
will further widen discrepancies in salaries and cause a sharp rise in public expenditure.
Civil service pay rises unacceptable
The government claims the recent pay offers to civil servants are
approximately the same as those of the private sector. The respective increases of 4.99
per cent for the senior rank and 2.38 per cent for middle and lower ranks are derived
after studying the results of the Pay Trend Survey on the private sector conducted last
year. However, I consider the survey has a number of constraints that affect its accuracy.
For example, target respondents were limited to large companies employing more than 100
staff. This sampling doesn't take into consideration the SMEs, which account for 98 per
cent of local companies and employ 70 per cent of the total workforce.
Data derived from the Pay Trend Survey, therefore, are not representative
enough. We have to acknowledge SMEs face more difficulties than larger firms. Some of
their employees got only a modest pay rise this year, while others' wages may still be frozen.
I know there has been a general decline in total payroll expenses in the
private sector in the past year as a result of streamlining manpower by substituting
employees with lower paid ones. Some employees received pay rises from money companies
saved from reducing payroll costs to compensate for their increased workload and to
maintain morale. But the Pay Trend Survey really cannot reflect this aspect.
Government selectively picks survey results
More dissatisfying is that even if we accept the credibility of such
surveys, it seems that the government selectively picks survey results. In the past two
years, when surveys revealed wages in the private sector were cut by an average of 2 per
cent, civil servants' wages
remained unchanged. But when survey results showed just a slight increase, civil servants
got a substantial rise. This indicates the government selects survey results.
In fact, civil servant salaries are already higher than those in the
private sector. For example, pay for civil servants responsible for miscellaneous tasks in
government offices ranges from HK$8,600 to over HK$11,000. A typist can earn a monthly
salary of between HK$8,600 and HK$15,000. Pay for similar jobs in the private sector is 30
to 40 per cent lower than that of the civil service.
In recent years, the government has regularly expressed its concern over
future deficits and insists that it is necessary to raise some fees regardless of market
conditions. It urged Legco to pass increasing taxes on six items proposed in the Budget,
which will only add HK$0.6 billion to its revenue. But the government's recent 'generous' wage offers to civil servants will cost HK$4
billion a year.
I really find this unacceptable. I fear that after the wage increase, the
government will raise taxes on the grounds of 'recovering costs,' and, of course, the financial burden will be passed onto the general
public and businesses to pay.
More infrastructure and HR investments
needed
Public money is Hong Kong citizens' money. The government must ensure it is used
appropriately. It should not offer big pay rises to civil servants at the expense of
taxpayers. I think the government has to invest more in infrastructure and human resources
which are conducive to Hong Kong's long-term development. I recently called on the Chief
Executive and the Financial Secretary to put forward my opinions.
I recommended that in the coming Budget, provisions for establishing an
'SME Fund' be allocated to
complement the HK$2 billion 'SME Finance Scheme.' This money would be used to help SMEs enhance their productivity.
And the government should also adopt some measures to accelerate economic integration with
the Pearl River Delta to increase funding for technological development - in light of the
expected growth of the knowledge economy and to improve tourist infrastructure and English
and Mandarin standards of citizens, etc.
As Financial Secretary Anthony Leung pointed out, the government should
reduce its 'expenses' and boost
its 'investment.' The large civil
service wage increases without doubt contradict the objective of reducing 'expenses.' The government must give this issue due
consideration to ensure public money is being properly spent. |