Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce
Directory | Opportunities | Information | Web Mart     HK Airport Flight Information   Current HK Traffic Condition   Current HK Weather Report

Advertise
In the Bulletin

From the Chairman

Legco Report

From the Director

Cover Story

SAR to play key role in Mainland's development

Special Feature 
Automating the supply chain

i-Perkin 
Hong Kong's port is busier than ever

Simon Says 
Pardon my language

Business

WTO Watch
   

Face to Face

Member Profile

Chamber Programmes
Re-kindling the 'can-do spirit'

Exposing the myths of the knowledge economy

.hk registration rules simplified

Wine


ARCHIVES

2008 Issues
2007 Issues
2006 Issues
2005 Issues
2004 Issues
2003 Issues
2002 Issues
2001 Issues
2000 Issues
1999 Issues

Search for

 
Advanced Search

SUBSCRIBE TO THE BULLETIN TODAY!

LEGCO REPORT                                                           July  2001 Issue


theBulletin.gif (2057 bytes)

Public money must not be squandered on pay rises





By James Tien


During the recent recession, many companies in Hong Kong were forced to cut employees'
pay and reduce the number of staff on their payroll. Although the economy is now showing signs of recovery, I know many companies, especially the small and medium enterprises, are still struggling. Statistics show that only a small proportion of employees this year received a pay rise, which averaged 2 per cent. Civil service pay rises, by contrast, are far higher than the average rate, and this will further widen discrepancies in salaries and cause a sharp rise in public expenditure.

Civil service pay rises unacceptable

The government claims the recent pay offers to civil servants are approximately the same as those of the private sector. The respective increases of 4.99 per cent for the senior rank and 2.38 per cent for middle and lower ranks are derived after studying the results of the Pay Trend Survey on the private sector conducted last year. However, I consider the survey has a number of constraints that affect its accuracy. For example, target respondents were limited to large companies employing more than 100 staff. This sampling doesn't take into consideration the SMEs, which account for 98 per cent of local companies and employ 70 per cent of the total workforce.

Data derived from the Pay Trend Survey, therefore, are not representative enough. We have to acknowledge SMEs face more difficulties than larger firms. Some of their employees got only a modest pay rise this year, while others' wages may still be frozen.

I know there has been a general decline in total payroll expenses in the private sector in the past year as a result of streamlining manpower by substituting employees with lower paid ones. Some employees received pay rises from money companies saved from reducing payroll costs to compensate for their increased workload and to maintain morale. But the Pay Trend Survey really cannot reflect this aspect.

Government selectively picks survey results

More dissatisfying is that even if we accept the credibility of such surveys, it seems that the government selectively picks survey results. In the past two years, when surveys revealed wages in the private sector were cut by an average of 2 per cent, civil servants' wages remained unchanged. But when survey results showed just a slight increase, civil servants got a substantial rise. This indicates the government selects survey results.

In fact, civil servant salaries are already higher than those in the private sector. For example, pay for civil servants responsible for miscellaneous tasks in government offices ranges from HK$8,600 to over HK$11,000. A typist can earn a monthly salary of between HK$8,600 and HK$15,000. Pay for similar jobs in the private sector is 30 to 40 per cent lower than that of the civil service.

In recent years, the government has regularly expressed its concern over future deficits and insists that it is necessary to raise some fees regardless of market conditions. It urged Legco to pass increasing taxes on six items proposed in the Budget, which will only add HK$0.6 billion to its revenue. But the government's recent 'generous' wage offers to civil servants will cost HK$4 billion a year.

I really find this unacceptable. I fear that after the wage increase, the government will raise taxes on the grounds of 'recovering costs,' and, of course, the financial burden will be passed onto the general public and businesses to pay.

More infrastructure and HR investments needed

Public money is Hong Kong citizens' money. The government must ensure it is used appropriately. It should not offer big pay rises to civil servants at the expense of taxpayers. I think the government has to invest more in infrastructure and human resources which are conducive to Hong Kong's long-term development. I recently called on the Chief Executive and the Financial Secretary to put forward my opinions.

I recommended that in the coming Budget, provisions for establishing an 'SME Fund' be allocated to complement the HK$2 billion 'SME Finance Scheme.' This money would be used to help SMEs enhance their productivity. And the government should also adopt some measures to accelerate economic integration with the Pearl River Delta to increase funding for technological development - in light of the expected growth of the knowledge economy and to improve tourist infrastructure and English and Mandarin standards of citizens, etc.

As Financial Secretary Anthony Leung pointed out, the government should reduce its 'expenses' and boost its 'investment.' The large civil service wage increases without doubt contradict the objective of reducing 'expenses.' The government must give this issue due consideration to ensure public money is being properly spent.

About HKGCC | Member Services | Join Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Jobs
The Chamber's Privacy Policy Statement
Copyright © 1998-2008 The Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce. All Rights Reserved.