| FACE
TO FACE
January 2001 Issue The Bulletin
Face to Face with the Business
Summit Panel

Members on the 7th Annual Hong Kong Business Summit Discussion Panel shared their views
with the audience on a host of issues impacting business in Hong Kong.
In his introduction of the panel, Chamber Chairman C C Tung said that the expansion of
Hong Kong's trade in both goods and services in the past year has been one of the key
factors in the SAR's exceptional economic recovery. It has also provided a solid base for
further improvement in the year ahead.
Indications that the U.S. economy is now slowing will likely ease demand for exports in
the coming year, but an important factor in the trade equation is how China's WTO
accession early next year will affect trade, he said.
The panel, consisting of Microsoft General Manager Graham Brant, HSBC Ltd Chairman
David Eldon, John Swire & Sons Chairman James Hughes-Hallett, Ernst & Young Far
East Chairman Anthony Wu, On Kun Hong Executive Director Andrew Yuen, Chamber Chief
Economist Ian Perkin, and Chamber Director and moderator for the panel Dr Eden Woon,
shared their thoughts on the challenges and opportunities awaiting Hong Kong. Following
are excerpts.
Question: In your forecast for inflation of 1 or 2 per cent next year,
I'm wondering if that inflation is some mixture of continued deflation in the property
sector and price growth that more than compensates other sectors, or do you think property
prices have bottomed out?
Ian Perkin: The forecast is actually based on property prices having
bottomed out. In terms of the CPI [Consumer Price Index] figure, the rental cycle is just
starting to run down. ... You can see it dropping now in the CPI. So as far as that is
concerned, that will drop out, we think, in the first quarter. ... So yes, we've seen the
prices bottom out and seen the rent cycle finish.
James
Hughes-Hallett: I'm pretty glad to hear Ian say the property prices have bottomed
out, but I think that is a fair reading.
Certainly in the commercial sector I think they have more than bottomed out, they've
turned up quite steeply, as anybody who has renewed rents recently will have found out to
their cost.
Retail is very patchy I think, and it really depends on where you are. There are areas
of retail property that may take a long time to recover. I guess the big question we all
have is, Ôwhat will happen in the residential market?' It seems to me there are two
markets developing. There is a pretty strong market up the upper end. There is a big blur
in the middle, and the lower end ... is still a question mark, but my view is that it is
at the bottom.
Question: Which of the logistics centre, financial centre or digital
centre has the greatest potential for success?
David Eldon: Obviously the financial sector! I guess the
problem the financial sector faces at the moment is what is it going to do in 2001? If you
look to see the growth, or perhaps the lack of growth, in areas like lending over the
course of the last 12 months, and where that may go in 2001, I think there is probably a
bit of an uncertain question mark.
What we have to do as a financial centre though is to remain competitive in the market,
and make sure we retain the skills in this market that we need to ensure that we are a
strong financial centre.
There are competing centres. People are trying very, very hard to knock Hong Kong off
its perch. That is fine by us, because I think we are capable of competing with the best
anywhere. The question that most frequently gets raised is, 'Isn't Shanghai going to
become the most important financial centre in Asia in time?'
There is no question in my mind that Shanghai already is an important financial centre.
And it is going to become more important. Is there a case for saying that it will
eventually overtake Hong Kong? If it does, that is not going to happen for quite some time
yet. We've got the skills here. We've got the infrastructure here. And I have great hopes
that Hong Kong will retain its number-one position.
Question: How do you Graham view this digital hub role of Hong Kong?
And how does Microsoft see Hong Kong and how it links to the Greater China region?
Graham Brant: There are a couple of aspects of Hong Kong
business which is very beneficial to helping this concept of a digital hub. One is the
concept of business agility and speed. It is a very entrepreneurial place: when companies
see an opportunity and a reason for doing something they will move quickly. The other
thing is the concept of deregulation, which provides a good environment to encourage that
creativity and ability to move fast.
I'll give you an example. The next 12 to 24 months is going to see some very, very
major changes in the wireless world in terms of mobile phone technology; in terms of the
ability to deliver data services wirelessly, and Hong Kong has every ability to be at the
forefront of that revolution.
... The ability to take risks, be creative and move fast in a very entrepreneurial
status and not too constrained by government regulations, that is, to me, a very good
basis for Hong Kong to continue to develop rapidly its role as the digital hub in Asia.
Question: Shenzhen ports are growing much faster than Hong Kong's
growth and competition is strong. There are concerns that charges here are high. How do
you see Hong Kong as a port? What will the port's role be in the future?
C
C Tung: Hong Kong will continue to do well in capturing particularly the southern
part of China's cargo movement, and the Pearl River Delta of course is a major
manufacturing centre for exports to the U.S. and Europe. Hong Kong has the critical mass;
it is the number-one container port today. It is well served by many of the shipping
companies. So in terms of service, coming through Hong Kong certainly is better than any
other port around us. Although physically and in terms of costs, Hong Kong probably is a
little more constrained today, but on the other hand the growth of exports will continue.
If Hong Kong's growth in terms of container throughput is of a smaller percentage, we have
a very large base to come off, so I think Hong Kong will still continue to do well.
Ian Perkin: Can I just add something to that. If you look at it
economically, overwhelmingly what is most important now is logistics Ð sorry about that
David! And then financial, and then digital. But I think the point of this is these three
areas, which are very important for Hong Kong, have to move forward together. If we fail
in any one of those, then the others will fail as well, because they tend to be mutually
supportive.
Question: I think one of the changes we've seen in recent years is the
attitude of the government, in terms of being intervenist, or leaving the economy alone.
So my question is do you see this as being good? Having the government wanting to be part
of making Hong Kong the hub of Asia and integrating Hong Kong into WTO? And if yes, where
do you think the government can add value?
Anthony Wu: I think the government will continue with its present
policy of minimum intervention. I think that has been a success factor of Hong Kong.
Especially when China enters the WTO, I think Hong Kong businesses do need a lot of help
from the government in really helping them take full benefit of this opportunity, and I
think the government will continue to adopt this present policy in helping businesses go
forward.
Andrew Yuen: I think the government has been helping the SMEs
in training and also urging banks to release more cash for the SMEs, which has been a
problem for most SMEs after the Asian financial crisis.
Eden Woon: The things the business community are looking for on
environmental protection, education reform, civil service reform, and also immigration
policy, are things that only a government can do. So this by no means is interference into
what business is doing, but provides just as much infrastructure as bridges and airports
and roads.
Question: There are some sectors of industry in Hong Kong that really
the Central Government holds purview over, particularly aviation ... . From a competitive
basis, what do you see in terms of Hong Kong having access to the mainland? And Hong Kong
companies getting a more level playing field?
C C Tung: I think we still face a lot of these issues. For example,
our company, OOCL, trades into China. We have offices in China, but we do not enjoy the
same benefits in this case as our competitors from the U.S. or Europe because they do have
the backing of a country and they are often able to come to a treaty agreement. ... While
a Hong Kong company, in reversal, we are actually being disadvan-taged. I think this level
playing field will probably become more level as soon as China gets into the WTO; as soon
as the WTO provision comes into play.
Anthony Wu: Looking at my own profession, we had a lot of
restrictions before, but moving forward a lot of restrictions have now actually been
relaxed. So there are a lot of opportunities and a more level paying field. Yes, we are
getting there but are not quite there yet. I think we do need a lot of help from the Hong
Kong Government and the Chinese government to really put everybody on a level playing
field.
Question: So far you've been talking about using Hong Kong as a hub
for China or Greater China. What are your feelings for the prospects for maintaining a
regional headquarters for the whole of Asia or Asia Pacific?
Graham Brant: We run about 80 per cent of our Asia operations out of
Hong Kong ... Japan remains our biggest financial revenue source in Asia, but for the
other 11 countries which are part of Microsoft Asia, Hong Kong is by far in the best
position to provide the centre of expertise in terms of what we do to support those
companies in terms of sales, marketing support, new technology ... With Japan in the north
and India in the south, geography alone means that Hong Kong has a very good position.
Anyone who has tried to run a regional centre out of Tokyo will spend half of their
life travelling through Narita Airport. So the ability to have Chek Lap Kok and its
connections to the rest of the world, just from the transportation point of view, is a
major benefit.
And the other thing is the question of the multinational culture that you have here in
Hong Kong. We have just over 250 staff based in Hong Kong now. Probably about 50 per cent
are local hires. The other half are people from many different nationalities and
experiences. That provides a very diverse culture and Hong Kong is a city that can support
that.
There are very, very few other places in Asia that has that. Singapore tends to drive
on an English-based culture; it has lost that local culture and I think it is that kind of
link between the two which is indeed very important. Tokyo is very Japanese -- most people
that go there spend a lot of time learning Japanese just to survive. So I think there are
many, many aspects -- even before you start to get to some of the business aspects -- that
make Hong Kong that obvious place for a hub base. B
|